(Per P. Swaroop Reddy, J.)

In all these writ petitions, as common questions of facts and law, arise for consideration, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein would be referred to, as they are arrayed before the learned Tribunal.

2. W.P. No. 18478 of 2004 is filed against the judgment in O.A. No. 1329 of 2002, which was disposed of by a common order dated 29.4.2004 along with O.A. Nos. 502 of 2004; 1 048 of 2002 and 328, 1515 and 263 of 2003; 424 of 2004 and 263 of 2003. W.P.No.24605 of 2004 is filed against the order in O.A.No.502 of 2004 and W.P. No. 24602 of 2004 is filed against the order in OANo.1515 of 2003; W.P. No. 48 of 2005 is filed against the order in O.A.No.1048 of 2002.

3. Similarly, the W.P. No. 22666 of 2005 is filed against the order in O.A.No.781 of 2002, which was disposed of by a common order along O.As.No.778 and 782 of 2002 on 22.7.2005. It is here again clarified that W.P. No. 22666 of 2005 is filed only against the order in O.A. No. 781 of 2002 and no other Writ petitions are filed challenging the order in other OAS.

4. The main issue involved in all these cases is: in pursuanc