SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(AP) 538

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Arvind Chenji – Appellant
Versus
Krisnaveni – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:D. Vathsakndra, P. Keshava Rao, Advocates.

Judgment :-

(1) The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent took place, on 11. 9. 1989. They were also blessed with two children. In the recent past, differences have arisen between them and the same resulted in institution of proceedings, under the relevant provisions of law, against each other.

(2) The petitioner filed FCOP No. 847 of 2000 in the Family Court, Hyderabad, against the respondent, for the relief of dissolution of the marriage. In that OP the respondent filed IA No. 101 of 2001, under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short 'the Act'), for grant of maintenance. The IA was allowed, on 2. 11. 2001. Interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 15,000/-, per month, was allowed, not only in favour of the respondent, but also to the two minor children. Ultimately, the OP. , was allowed, on 28. 6. 2005.

(3) The respondent filed EP No. 50 of 2008 in IA No. 101 of 2001 for recovery of arrears of maintenance granted to her with interest at 24% per annum. She has furnished the facts and figures in the EP. She specifically prayed for attachment of the movable properties mentioned in the ep schedule. The petitioner filed counter, opposing the EP. He stated that ther




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top