ORDER (Per V. Eswaraiah, J.)

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Registrar (Vigilance)/lst respondent in W.P.23719/2008 filed this review petition under Rule-24 of the Writ Rules read with Section 1140fCPC to review the order of this Court dated 26-03-2009 in W.P.23719 of 2008.

2. The question that arises for consideration in this review petition is whether it can be said that the review petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order, and if so, whether there are any grounds made out for review of the order of this Court.

3. The review petition is maintainable under Rule-24 of the Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 read with Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code if the review petitioner discovers new and important matter or evidence which, after exercise of due diligence was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time when the order was made, or on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of record, or for any other sufficient reason.

Unless a mistake has been crept in or an error is apparent on the face of the record is made out, it is not open for the aggrieved person to obtain a review of the order made 40 against him

Click Here to Read the rest of this document