D.S.R. Varma, J.

Heard the learned Advocate General, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, appearing for the appellants, the leaned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 and the learned Standing Counsel for Municipality, appearing for the respondent No.2.

2. This Writ Appeal is directed against the order, dated 11-12-2007, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court, allowing the Writ Petition No. 7839 of 2006.

3. Appellants are respondent Nos.1 and 2, respondent No.1 is the writ petitioner and respondent No.2 is the respondent No.3 in the said writ petition.

4. The prayer in the said writ petition is as follows:-

"Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions declaring the action of the Respondents in depriving the petitioner of use of the land of 5.80 Acres shown as excess open space in L.P. No. 714/1984 as arbitrary, unconstitutional and illegal and to issue consequential direction to the respondents either