SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(AP) 680

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Parisa Anjali – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. K.S.N.Murthy, Counsel for the Appellants.
Mr. B.H.R. Chowdary, Counsel for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

One P. Narasimha Rao, husband of the 1st appellant and father of appellants 2 to 4, boarded a Train, bearing No.6039 - Ganga Kaveri Express, at Vijayawada, on the intervening night of 4th and 5th January, 1997, to go to Warangal. He accidentally fell from the train at Mahaboobabad and died, while undergoing treatment. The appellants filed O.A.A.No. 47 of 1997 before the Secunderabad Bench of the Railway Claims Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal). It was pleaded that the deceased was a bona fide passenger and died in an untoward incident. The respondent opposed the claim, by filing written statement. The appellants were put to strict proof of the facts pleaded by them, including the fact that they are the legal heirs of the deceased. The Tribunal dismissed the claim petition, through its order, dated 04-12-2007.

Hence this appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that there was no dispute, as regards the fact that the deceased was travelling in Ganga Kaveri Express, and that he has fallen and died, while the train was in motion. He contends that the evidence of A. W -2 and the Pointsman of Mahaboobabad cabin, clearly established that the death was due to accidental



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top