SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(AP) 674

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Mudureddipalle Sanjeeva Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Butturu Rama Mohan Reddy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.N Narasimha Reddy, Counsel for the Appellants; K. Sita Ram, Counsel for the Respondent No.1.

JUDGMENT :-

The 1st respondent filed OS No.321 of 1999 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddatur, against the 2nd respondent; the appellant and respondents 3 and 4, for the relief of recovery of certain amount. He pleaded that the 2nd respondent entered into an agreement of sale with him, on 3.7.1978, offering to sell an item of immovable property for a sum of Rs.1,50,000/-, and received Rs.75,000/-, as advance. It is stated that, shortly thereafter, the 2nd respondent executed sale deeds in favour of the appellant and respondents 3 and 4, as regards the same property. The suit was opposed by the appellant and respondents 2 to 4. The 2nd respondent did not deny the execution of agreement of sale in favour of the 1st respondent. The appellant and respondents 3 and 4 filed common written statement, asserting their title over the property on the basis of sale deed, dated 18.12.1998. Through its judgment, dated 22.4.2002, the trial Court decreed the suit, and created charge over the property, owned by the appellant. AS No.126 of 2002, filed by the appellant, in the Court of II Additional District Judge, Kadapa, was dismissed, on 27.7.2007. Hence, this second appeal.

2. Sr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top