The respondents 1 to 3 filed O.S.No.186 of 2003 against the petitioners and respondents 4 to 6 (defendants 2 to 4), in the Court of Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, for the relief of perpetual injunction, and to declare that the G.P.A., said to have been executed in favour of the 1st petitioner and one, Mr.Chandrasekar Reddy, as illegal, and consequently to set aside the sale deeds bearing document Nos.1542 and 1548, dated 17-04-2003.

The trial of the suit commenced. Respondents 1 to 3 filed I.A.No.4115 of 2007, under Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C., with a prayer to permit them to amend the plaint, by including certain sale deeds, in the prayer portion of the plaint, and I.A.No.4116 of 2007, under Order VII Rule 14 C.P.C., with a prayer to receive the documents. It was alleged that the respondents 1 to 3 were not aware of all the transactions, carried out on the basis of G.P.A., and the filing of the applications became necessary after the various sale transactions. The petitioners opposed the applications on several grounds. It was alleged that the scope of the suit does not permit such amendment, and that the prayer becomes untenable, in view of the amendment caused t