SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 8

G.ROHINI
Devarakonda Sri Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Government of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Ratnam, Advocate. For the Respondents: G.P. for Tourism, Sports & Youth Services.

Judgment :

1. The petitioner herein was appointed as a Library Assistant in Sports Authority of A.P. on consolidated pay of Rs.750/- per month vide proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 23.3.1988.Subsequently, she was extended the scale of pay of Rs.910-30-1240-35-1625 w.e.f. 1.9.1992 in the post of Library Assistant. On 22.9.1997 she was promoted as Senior Assistant and ultimately retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.11.1997.

2. Aggrieved by the alleged action of the respondents in not extending the retirement benefits, including pension, she filed W.P.No.5365 of 2003. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court by order dated 28.03.2003 with a direction to the Sports Authority of A.P. to pass appropriate orders with regard to the claim of the petitioner for retirement benefits. Pursuant thereto, the 2nd respondent vide memo dated 30.06.2003informed the petitioner that since she had rendered less than the prescribed qualifying service of ten years, she was entitled to receive only the service gratuity as per Rule 46 read with Rule 45 (1) of the A.P. Revised Pension Rules, 1980 and since the same was already paid to her, there were no dues pay























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top