SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(AP) 21

UPENDRA LAL WAGHRAY
Emani Venkata Subba Rao – Appellant
Versus
Kanikicharla Nagabhushanam – Respondent


Advocates:
M.R.K. Choudary, (Amicus Curiaer) for Petitioner; K. Harinath, for Respondent.

Judgement

ORDER :- This petition under S.115 C. P. C. has been filed to revise the order of the Subordinate Judge, Bapatla, in I. A. Nos. 217 and 641 of 1980 in O.S. No. 23 of 1976. The petitioner has filed this revision as it party-in-person and when the matter came up for hearing in the morning, I had requested the learned Counsel. Sri M.R.K. Choudary to act as amicus curiaer in this matter and adjourned the matter to after lunch to enable him to go through the records. The matter was taken up after lunch and Mr. Choudary has presented the case on behalf of the petitioner. I have also heard the learned Counsel for the respondent.

2. The petitioner filed the suit, O. S. No. 23 of 1976 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court. Bapatla against the sole defendant for recovery of various amounts. The said suit was dismissed with costs by the judgment and decree dated 28-4-1979. It appears that the defendant has filed E. P. No. 144 of 1979 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Tenali for the recovery of costs awarded to him from the petitioner plaintiff, though it is not clear from the records, probably after the decree was transferred to that Court for execution. The present




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top