KUPPUSWAMY
Kalepu Pala Subrahmanyam – Appellant
Versus
Tiguti Venkata Peddiraju – Respondent
ORDER :- The petitioner is the plaintiff in O. P. No. 62 of 1965, Sub-Court, Kakinada, a suit filed in forma pauperis for recovery of possession of plaint A to C Schedule properties. The Court below by its order D/-2-3-1968 held that he had means to pay and rejected his application to sue in forma pauperis. This order was confirmed by the High Court in revision and thereafter, the petitioner restricted his right only to a half share and paid a court-fee of Rs. 2,602/-.
2. Again, by his order dated 25-2-1969 the learned Subordinate Judge held that the suit was barred by time in respect of items 1, 2 (a), 2 (b), 2 (c) and 3 (a) of plaint B Schedule and items 1 and 2 (a) of plaint C Schedule. He, therefore, rejected the plaint in respect of those items. As far as item 4 of plaint B Schedule was concerned, he directed the plaintiff to file an application to treat the relief regarding Item 4 as one filed under Section 47, Civil P. C. The plaintiff has filed the above revision petition.
The main contention of the petitioner is that the court below erred in holding that the suit was barred by limitation. The case of the plaintiff regarding most of the items is that the properties w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.