SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(AP) 1083

High Court of Andhra Pradesh
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY
J. CHAKRADHAR
VERSUS
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Writ Petition No. 15602 of 2001
Date of Judgment : 22-12-2008

Advocates appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:K.G. Krishna Murtby, Rayalaseema, Telangana, V.T.M. Prasad, Advocates.

Headnote:

Religious institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 - Section 57 and 72 - Petitioner contends that funds of Devasthanam are nothing but contributions made by devotees in different forms and they cannot be utilized for any purpose other than one for development of temple or for propagation of religious tenets with Devasthanam - It is stated that necessity to bring the Government Hospital under control of Devasthanam arose on account of disturbance of budgetary allocations and availability of surplus funds with Devasthanam - According to respondents, allocation of surplus funds for maintenance of Government Hospital is permissible under Section 72 of Andhra pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 - Persons with religious bent up of mind express their faith towards institutions symbolizing deity or cult - This may include endowment of their properties or resources for development and propagation of institutions or making of informal contributions in the form of offerings etc - Object is to help institution to survive flourish and develop – Persons who make such contributions feel their participation in the task which according to them is noble - Power vested with Government to administer such institutions is limited to ensure that they are managed properly and funds are not diverted for other purposes –Held, First respondent appears to have gained such courage, to put a totally distorted and deliberate misinterpretation only because they were convinced, that there would be none to check their illegality - It is the blatant illegalities of this nature, that have led to a situation where persons belonging to so-called majority community are complaining that they are treated as second-class citizens in their own country - intended to provide able and efficient administration to Hindu religious institutions was converted into a device to gain complete control over such institutions -Secular aspects have overtaken the spiritual ones -In many cases salary of an Archaka is not even a fraction of the salary paid to an Attender and expenditure towards salaries of administrative staff constitutes major chunk - Different heads of accounts are evolved, to divert the funds of the institutions - Another disturbing feature is that while a substantial portion of funds of institutions are taken away by Government on one pretext or other institutions without any income are totally neglected - Petition is accordingly allowed

Judgment :

(1) THE petitioner claims to be a devotee of Sri Durga Malleswara Swamy devasthanam, Indra Keeladri Hills, vijayawada, (for short 'the Devasthanam'). He feels aggrieved by the orders of the first respondent issued in G. O. Ms. No. 135, health, Medical and Family Welfare (Ml)Department, dated 11. 4. 2001. Through the said G. O. , the Government decided to handover the Government General Hospital, vijayawada to the Devasthanam for maintenance thereof with its surplus funds. It is stated that this step became necessary in view of the reorganization of the affairs between N. T. R. University of Health sciences, Vijayawada on the one hand and the Director of Medical Education, hyderabad on the other.

(2) THE petitioner contends that the funds of the Devasthanam are nothing but contributions made by the devotees in different forms and they cannot be utilized for any purpose other than the one for development of the temple or for propagation of the religious tenets with the Devasthanam.

(3) COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT is filed by the assistant Secretary, Government of A. P. , department of Medical and Health, hyderabad. It is stated that necessity to bring the Government Hospital under the control of the Devasthanam arose on account of the disturbance of budgetary allocations and availability of surplus funds with the Devasthanam. According to the respondents, the allocation of surplus funds for maintenance of Government Hospital is permissible under Section 72 of the Andhra pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (for short 'the Act').

(4) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Medical, Health and Family Welfare and the learned Standing Counsel for the devasthanam.

(5) IT is an age old practice that the persons with religious bent up of mind, express their faith towards the institutions symbolizing the deity or cult. This may include endowment of their properties or resources for the development and propagation of the institutions, or making of informal contributions in the form of offerings in hundi, etc. The object is to help the institution, to survive, flourish and develop. The persons, who make such contributions, feel their participation in the task, which according to them, is noble. The power vested with the Government to administer such institutions is limited to ensure that they are managed properly and the funds are not diverted for other purposes. To ensure objectivity in the matter of spending surplus funds, the a. P. State Legislature had enacted section 72 of the Act, which reads as under:

Section 72: Utilisation of surplus funds. (1) Where there is a surplus in the funds of an institution or endowment including a specific endowment attached thereto after providing for all the objects, needs, requirements or improvements of the institution or endowment and after making adequate provision for purposes referred to in sub-section

(2) of Section 57, the trustee may make an application in the manner prescribed for permission to utilize such surplus fund for all or any of the following purposes: (i) propagation of the religious tenets or the institution or endowment; (ii) establishment and maintenance of schools for the training of archakas, adhyapakas and vedaparayanikas and for the study of Divya Prabhandams and the like for furthering education in sanskrit; (iii) establishment and maintenance of, any institution in which special provision is made for the study of Hindu Religion, philosophy or Sastras or for imparting instruction in Hindu Temple Architecture, and for setting up libraries in connection with such study; (iv) grant of aid to any other Hindu religious institution or endowment which is in poor or needy circumstances or which require renovation; (v) establishment and maintenance of hospitals and dispensaries for the relief of the pilgrims and worshippers visiting the religious institutions; (vi) construction and maintenance of chou














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top