SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(AP) 240

P.S.NARAYANA
Randhi Seethamma – Appellant
Versus
Silla Venkata Ramana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:K.S. Gopala Krishnan, K.V. Subba Reddy, Advocates.

Judgment :-

(1) This Court ordered notice before admission on 29. 12. 2008 and granted interim stay for a limited period in CRPMP no. 7744 of 2008, which is being extended from time to time.

(2) The matter is coming up for admission.

(3) Heard Sri K. S. Gopalakrishnan, the learned Counsel representing the revision petitioner and Sri K. V. Subba Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the respondent.

(4) This civil revision petition is filed against an order, dated 27. 11. 2008 made in ia No. 1297 of 2007 in OS No. 163 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, srikakulam. The said application was filed by the plaintiff/respondent herein under order 32 of the Civil Rules of Practice praying for permission to the General Power of Attorney Holder to represent the plaintiff. It is stated that the plaintiff, who filed the suit is the son-in-law of the General Power of Attorney Holder and his son-in-law had been to U. S. A. for his higher studies and he is aware of the agreement of sale and in order to prosecute the case further, the original plaintiff executed the General power of Attorney on 6. 8. 2005 in U. S. A. The said application was resisted by the revision petitio
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top