ORDER :-This Court ordered notice before admission on 31.7.2008 and granted interim stay for a limited period. Though the respondent had been served, none represents the respondent.

2. The revision petitioner is the appellant in AS No.153/2006 on the file of IV Additional District Judge, Kurnool. The petitioner, as plaintiff, instituted the suit O.S. No.1039/2004 for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the respondent/ defendant and her men from making any encroachment and making any constructions in the raastha shown as GG1 BB1 in the plaint plan. The specific stand taken by the revision petitioner/plaintiff is that the said raastha measures 12 links whereas the stand taken by the respondent/defendant is that the raastha is only 10 links. The respondent also had taken a stand that she was not at all constructing any compound wall in the disputed raastha and the construction of the compound wall by her in anyway would not obstruct the right of the petitioner to have ingress and egress.

3. It appears that the suit was dismissed and aggrieved by the same, the revision petitioner had carried the matter by way of Appeal A.S. No.153/2000 on the file of IV Additional District Jud

Click Here to Read the rest of this document