SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 399

B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
Valladasu Alivelu – Appellant
Versus
Moguthula Yadaiah – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Prabhakar reddy, Advocate. For the Respondents:B. Mahender reddy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 15.12.2009 passed in I.A.No.507 of 2009 in O.S.No.63 of 2006 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, at Deverakonda, whereby and whereunder the learned Junior Civil Judge dismissed the application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC.

2. Background facts in a nutshell leading to filing of this Civil Revision Petition by the plaintiff in O.S.No.63 of 2006 are: The petitioner/plaintiff filed the suit being O.S.No.63 of 2006 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Devarakonda, against the respondents/defendants for partition and separate possession of her share in the suit schedule properties. It is the version of the plaintiff that the suit schedule properties are the joint family properties and she being the daughter of Moguthala Narsimha is entitled to half share in the suit schedule properties and whereas, the 1st defendant, who is her paternal uncle, is entitled for another half share. The defendants filed written statement resisting the claim of the plaintiff. It is the version of the defendants that the plaintiff relinquished her share in the suit schedule properties under a document dated 22.05









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top