SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 172

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD
Allada Bhaskara Rao & Others
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayatraj and Rural Development (RWS-III) Department, Hyderabad & Others
Writ Petition Nos. 20519, 20701, 20935, 21382 & 22010 of 2009
Date of Judgment : 08-03-2010

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Taddi Nageswara Rao, Vinay Kamisetty, Dammalapati Srinivas, Advocates. For the Respondents: Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, R3 to R8 - M. Prabhakara Rao, Senior Counsel.

Headnote:A) NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE ACT, 2005, Sections 13, 16, 17 and 18 - Constitution of India, Article 226 – Reconstitution of Awareness cum Monitoring Committee at village level in respect of Indiramma programs under the Act under G.O.Ms. No.350 Panchayat & Rural Development Department by G.O.Ms. No.274 Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department on the ground that it violates Article 40 of the Constitution of India and 73rd Amendment to the Constitution. – Removing the role of Sarpanches of Gram Panchayath is not in furtherance of the objectives of G.O.Ms.No:140 which call for confinement of benefits of the scheme to bonafide beneficiaries in the village

       B) G.O.Ms. No.350 Panchayat & Rural Development Department by G.O.Ms. No.274 Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department – Displacement of democratically elected Sarpanches of Gram Panchayath with an administratively posted executive body with no tangible rationale or explicable justification cannot be sustained, when such an attempt is plainly opposed to the object, purpose, letter and spirit of the 73rd Constitution Amendment.

       C) NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE ACT, 2005, Sections 13, 16, 17 and 18 - Constitution of India, Article 226 - Impugned administrative order being motivated with a mala fide intention to exclude petitioners from selection of beneficiaries, equally unsupported and unsubstantiated by any data on record apart from offending the 73rd Constitution Amendment - G.O. No.274 is not in tune with the declared objectives declared in the Act and colorable exercise of power.

JUDGMENT :-

(Per Justice G. Bhavani Prasad)

1. G.O.Ms.No.274 Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (RWS.III) Department, dated 08-09-2009 (for short “G.O.Ms. No.274”) by which G.O.Ms.No.350 Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (RWS-III) Department, dated 31-08-2006 (for short “G.O.Ms.No.350) was amended substituting the original paragraph No.5 with a new paragraph providing for the names of the local persons, namely, a member from among the elected Ward Members of the Gram Panchayat, a Woman Member from among the Self Help Group and a Person of the village, who is having interest in development activities, to be submitted by the Mandal Parishad Development Officer to the District Collector, who will in turn take the approval of the District In-charge Minister, for reconstitution of the Village Level Implementation-cum-Monitoring Committee at Gram Panchayat Level in respect of various activities under INDIRAMMA Programme, is under challenge in this batch of writ petitions.

2. The petitioners are mostly Sarpanches of various Gram Panchayats (except the 3rd petitioner in W.P. No.20701 of 2009, who is a Mandal Parishad Territorial Constituency Member) and contend that various Government Orders were issued by State Government from time to time to enable the Gram Panchayats to function as units of self- government after the Seventy-third Amendment to the Constitution of India and various development activities and programmes are taken up at the village level including the Integrated Novel Development In Rural Areas and Model Municipal Areas popularly known as INDIRAMMA Programme. G.O.Ms.No.350 was issued keeping in view the provisions of the Seventy-third Constitution Amendment for reconstituting the Implementation-cum-Monitoring Committee for INDIRAMMA Programme with the Sarpanch as Chairperson to ensure that only eligible persons will get the benefit of the Programme and to find out and take action regarding ineligible beneficiaries. Phase I and Phase II Projects under INDIRAMMA Programme were undertaken for the benefit of the persons selected by the Committee and most of the Sarpanches of Gram Panchayats selected under Phase I and Phase II belong to ruling party, while those selected under Phase III are not so. The Government issued G.O.Ms.No.505 Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (RWS.III) Department, dated 12-11-2007 in respect of preparatory works for implementation of Phase III of the Programme specifying that the constitution of the Village Level Implementation Committee and Monitoring Committee shall be as per the provisions of G.O.Ms. No.350. The selection of beneficiaries should commence from 01-01-2008 and by G.O.Ms.No.238 Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (RWS.III) Department, dated 01-08-2009, the existing composition of the Committee was changed still retaining the Sarpanch as the Chairman/Chairperson, but making a Member from among the elected Ward Members of Gram Panchayat, a Woman Member from among Self Help Group, a Person of the village, who is having interest in development activities and the Panchayat Secretary, as Members, the last being Member Convener, in the place of a Member of Rajeev Yuva Shakti Group, a Member of the Women Self Help Group, three local persons having interest in development activities and the Village Secretary, the last being Member Convener.

3. By virtue of the impugned G.O., the provision for submission of the names of the local persons by the Panchayat Secretary/Village Secretary in consultation with the Sarpanch, was deleted and the intent and purpose of G.O.Ms.No.350 was defeated. The Sarpanch as the Chairman of the Committee was reduced to a figure head with the Committee being constituted in entirety, in effect and substance, by the Mandal Parishad Development Officer. The Directive Principle under Article 40 of the Constitution to endow the Gram Panchayats with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government, was defeated and the Seventy































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top