SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 558

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Chukka Ramaiah – Appellant
Versus
Chekuru Bujjiah – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Nagaraju Naguru, Advocate. For the Respondent:
N.A.

JUDGMENT :-

The respondent filed O.S.No.62 of 2007 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Nandalur for recovery of certain amounts on the basis of a promissory note. The petitioner denied the allegations made by the respondent. The trial of the suit commenced and the evidence adduced on behalf of the respondent was recorded. The petitioner deposed as DW.1. He wanted to examine scribe of the promissory note as DW.2. As a matter of fact, an affidavit in lieu of chief examination of DW.2 was filed.

The petitioner filed I.A.No.20 of 2010 under Section 31 read with Section 151 CPC with a prayer to issue summons to DW.2. The application was opposed by the respondent. The trial Court dismissed the I.A., through its order dated 5.02.2010. Hence this revision petition. Sri N. Nagaraju, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though DW.2 agreed to depose as a witness in relation to the allegation as to his scribing the promissory note, he refused to cooperate after filing the affidavit in lieu of chief examination. He submits that the trial Court has ample power to summon such witness.

The respondent was served with notice, but he has not chosen to enter appearance.

In the course of tria



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top