SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 615

G.BHAVANI PRASAD
Pabba Satyamma @ Renykunta Balaiah – Appellant
Versus
Pabba Sathyamma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Govind, Advocate. For the Respondents:M. Rajamalla Reddy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the auction held on 28-01-2010 in pursuance of the order passed in I.A.No.481 of 2005 in O.S.No.55 of 2000 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Siddipet.

O.S. No.55 of 2000 between the petitioner herein and the respondents herein was filed by the respondents 1 and 2 for partition and separate possession of the suit house bearing Door No.6-2-68 situated at Borra Hanuman Temple, Siddipet and a preliminary decree was passed by the trial Court on 11-12-2003 granting 2/3rd share to the plaintiffs and 1/3rd share to the revision petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 herein. A.S.No.6 of 2004 against the preliminary decree at the instance of the revision petitioner was dismissed by the Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet on 22-10-2005 and Second Appeal No.1569 of 2005 was dismissed by the High Court on 23-06-2006. Thereafter, an Advocate Commissioner was appointed by the trial Court to effect partition of the property by metes and bounds and the Commissioner in his report dated 21-01-2009 stated that the width of the property is only 14 feet 4 inches and in view of its shape, it is difficult to effect partition of the pr




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top