1. Heard Sri P.V. Narayana Rao, the learned Counsel representing the Revision petitioner/plaintiff. The respondent/defendant had been served and none represents the respondent/defendant.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the Revision petitioner/plaintiff being aggrieved of the order made in I.A.No.1442/2008 in O.S.No.251/2004 on the file of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal. The said application was filed under Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act (in short hereinafter referred to as “Act” for the purpose of convenience) and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter in short referred to as “Code” for the purpose of convenience) to permit the petitioner to lead secondary evidence in respect of the agreement dated 21-1-1981 and affidavit dated 7-8-1989. The learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal after recording reasons came to the conclusion that such documents cannot be permitted by way of secondary evidence and ultimately the said application was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition had been preferred.

3. Sri P.V. Narayana Rao, the learned Counsel repr