SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 684

G.BHAVANI PRASAD
Thumu Srikanth – Appellant
Versus
Akula Babu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:G. Dhananjai, Advocate. For the Respondent:-----

JUDGMENT :

The dismissal of the petition in I.A. No.922 of 2007 in O.S. No.192 of 2006 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Gajwel by the order dated 15-12-2009 led the unsuccessful petitioner/plaintiff to file the present revision.

The petition was filed requesting to obtain the signatures and thumb impressions of the plaintiff and the defendant in the presence of their counsel in open Court and to get them examined and compared by the Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad along with the signatures and thumb impressions in the sale deed document No.2505/2005, registered on 25-04-2005. The petitioner/plaintiff contended that the suit property was purchased by him under the document in question from the defendant, the original document having been filed along with the suit. The defendant pleaded the said document to be sham, fabricated and created by impersonating the defendant and by forging his signature. In view of the said defence arose the request of the petitioner/plaintiff.

The defendant resisted the request contending that the alleged sale deed is a fabricated document and even if the registered sale deed is proved to have been executed by him, still the s










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top