SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 292

SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
A. V. R. Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Nunna Venkata Ravanamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:Anjana Devi, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(1) These two petitions are filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C by the accused for quashing proceedings in C.C. Nos.861 of 2009 and 843 of 2009 on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam relating to offences punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The 1st respondent in both the petitions are the respective complaints in the said criminal cases. The cases were filed in the lower Court on the ground that the petitioner/accused issued respective cheques in favour of the respective complainants for the respective amounts in discharge of respective legally enforceable debts and that when the respective complainants presented them for encashment, those cheques were dishonoured. After the respective complainants filed respective complaints in the lower Court, the lower Court took cognizance of the offences against the petitioner after receiving sworn statements of the respective complainants by way of affidavits.

(2) The only point on which the petitioner is seeking quashing of the criminal cases is that the lower Court did not follow the procedure prescribed by law before taking cognizance in as much as the lower Court did not recor





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top