SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 583

High Court of Andhra Pradesh
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY
Valisetti Chandra Rekha & Another
Versus
The State of A.P., rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. & Another
Criminal Petition No.963 of 2008
Decided on : 08-07-2010

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:K. Srinivas, Advocate.
For the Respondents: R1, Public Prosecutor.

Headnote:

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Sections 18, 19 and 20, subsection (1) of Section 31 quash the proceedings - Domestic Violence Case - Petitioners who are respondent in the Domestic Violence Case on the file of VI Additional Magistrate for the offences punishable under Sections of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act - Petitioners cannot be punished for any offence under the Act - Only on violating the Protection Orders passed under Section of the Act and Residence Orders under Section of Act Magistrate can proceed under Section of Act and can summon violators to show cause why penalty for breach of protection should not be imposed on them – Held, Respondents and they can either appear before the court or can be represented by an Advocate for passing appropriate orders under Section of the Act issuing of summons and non-bailable warrants for their presence is not at all warranted at the stage of passing of the protection orders or residence orders by the concerned Magistrate - On issuing such Non-bailable warrants on the presumption that they have committed the offence under Act petitioners approached this Court for quashment of the proceedings - Passed against all respondents preventing them from interfering with possession of the aggrieved person in Domestic Violence Case mere impleadment of the petitioners in the in Domestic Violence Case does not give raise to a criminal offence to quash proceedings at the initial stage - Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed

Judgment

Petitioners, who are respondent Nos.3 and 5 in the Domestic Violence Case No.25 of 2007 on the file of VI Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur for the offences punishable under Sections 18, 19 and 20 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for brevity, “the Act”), filed this petition to quash the proceedings initiated against them.

The petitioners cannot be punished for any offence under the Act. Only on violating the Protection Orders passed under Section 18 of the Act and Residence Orders under Section 19 of the Act, the Magistrate can proceed under Section 31 of the Act and can summon the violators to show cause why penalty for breach of the protection should not be imposed on them. Further as per Section 32 of the Act, the offence under subsection (1) of Section 31 of the Act shall be a cognisable and non-bailable one. Before passing any orders, summons have to be served on the respondents and they can either appear before the court or can be represented by an Advocate for passing appropriate orders under Section 18 or 19 of the Act. In view of the same, issuing of summons and non-bailable warrants for their presence, is not at all warranted, at the stage of passing of the protection orders or residence orders by the concerned Magistrate. On issuing such Non-bailable warrants on the presumption that they have committed the offence under the Act, the petitioners approached this Court for quashment of the proceedings.

Since the resident orders can be passed against all the respondents, preventing them from interfering with the possession of the aggrieved person in the Domestic Violence Case, mere impleadment of the petitioners in the in the Domestic Violence Case, does not give raise to a criminal offence to quash the proceedings at the initial stage.

The Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the learned Magistrate is directed to proceed with the matter without taking coercive steps for the appearance of the petitioners. If the petitioners chose not to represent in the matter, ex parte orders can be passed and only if they violate the orders, they can be proceeded under Section 31 of the Act as referred above.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top