L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Y. Venkata Reddy, S/o. late Yella Reddy – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Wakf Bpard. Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, Haj House Complex, Nampalli, Hyderabad – Respondent
COMMON ORDER: The petitioners herein filed six separate suits in the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur against the respective defendants therein for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule properties. They have also filed applications under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. It is stated that an order of temporary injunction granted by the trial Court is in force. A.P. State Wakf Board represented by its Chief Executive Officer, the first respondent in each of the revisions, filed applications under Rule 10 of Order I C.P.C., with a prayer to implead it as defendant in each of the suits. It was pleaded that the suit schedule properties belong to the Wakf Board. The applications were resisted by the petitioners both on merits and maintainability. Through common order, dated 21.02.2009 the trial Court allowed the applications. Hence, these six revisions. Sri S.V. Sundara Rajan, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that in a suit for injunction simplicitor it is ultimately for the plaintiff to choose the opponents and no third party can get impleaded contrary to the wishes of the plaintiff. He submits that in case, the first re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.