SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(AP) 413

G.RAJASURIA
K. K. MANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HASAN MOHAMMED JINNAH, S.Ayyathurai,

( 1 ) ANIMADVERTING upon the judgment dated 17. 11. 2005 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions judge (Fast Track Court No. I), Salem in criminal Appeal No. 58 of 2005 confirming the judgment dated 23. 03. 2005 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No. II, Attur in C. C. No. 238 of 2004, this criminal revision petition is focussed.

( 2 ) A 'resume' of facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this Criminal Revision petition would run thus:

(i) The police laid the police report in terms of Section 173 of Cr. P. C as against the accused for the offences under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of I. P. C. Since the accused pleaded not guilty, trial was conducted.

(ii) On the side of the prosecution, P. Ws. 1 to 13 were examined and Exs. P1 to P8 were marked. On defence side, no oral or documentary evidence was adduced. Ultimately, the trial court convicted the accused and imposed sentences as under: offences sentence imposed fine amount (i) 279 IPC rs. 250/- (in default to undergo one month simple imprisonment) (ii) 304-A IPC six months simple imprisonment rs. 1,000/- (in default to undergo one month simple imprisonment)The accused preferred appe




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top