SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(AP) 956

B.CHANDRA KUMAR
PEETA VENKATESWARLU – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR-I, GUNTUR DISTRICT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PEETARAMAN, V.N.ANAGANI,

( 1 ) THIS revision case has been filed challenging the order, dated 18. 10. 2007 in Crl. MP No. 1324 of 2007 on the file of the II Additional Munsif Magistrate, Repalle, wherein and whereby the petition filed by the petitioner herein was dismissed.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are as follows: the petitioner herein is the Secretary of the second respondent -Nagaram Primary agricultural Co-operative Society (hereinafter referred to as 'second respondent-society' ). Initially he was appointed as Secretary vide proceedings No. 43 (2)79/riio/ps, dated 18. 7. 1979 and was posted at Rajavolu pacs, Repalle, Guntur District. Later on, he was allotted to Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Dhulipudi (for short 'dhulipudi PACS' ). His services were regularized as a permanent employee. However, on some allegations, he was placed under suspension by the Dhulipudi PACS. The petitioner challenged his suspension order by filing WP No. 16303 of 1999 and subsequently, he had withdrawn the writ petition on 17. 4. 2001 on the assurance given by the Divisional Co-operative Officer to consider his case. The Divisional cooperative Officer instructed the person-in-charge of the then Dhulipudi



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top