SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 539

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Rafiuddin – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Counsel for the petitioner: Sri T.Surya Karan Reddy
Counsel for the Respondent: Sri R.A.Atchuthanand

ORDER

The respondent is the owner of an extent of Acs.4.03 guntas of land in survey No.181 of Shamshabad Village and Mandal, abutting the National Highway. The petitioner is an advertising agency. It approached the respondent to grant licence for erection of unipole hording on his land. Both of them, agreed for terms of licence, and through agreement, dated 11.03.2008, the consideration was agreed to be Rs.19 lakhs per annum payable in monthly instalments, after deducting the income tax at source. Enhancement thereof is provided at 5%, per annum.

2. Disputes arose between the parties. The petitioner issued a notice, dated 10.04.2009, terminating the licence, on the ground that the visibility of the hording is seriously hampered.

3. The respondent filed O.S.No.313 of 2009 in the Court of IV Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, for declaration that the termination of the lease by the petitioner is untenable and for consequential benefit, such as, recovery of arrears of rents. He has also filed I.A.No.3532 of 2009, which has since been renumbered as I.A.No.212 of 2010, under Order XVA C.P.C., for a direction to the petitioner to deposit admitted arrears of licence fee and


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top