NISAR AHMAD KAKRU
R. Chandrashekar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru
1. Unbelievable but a hard fact, that this Writ Petition filed in furtherance of an endeavour to show the door to Sri Justice C. V. Nagarjuna Reddy, a Judge of this Court, originates from anger and annoyance of the Petitioner-Advocate, arising out of refusal by the Judge to be contributory to a call of boycott of the Courts, given by Telangana Advocates Joint Action Committee on 13-09-2010, in support of demand for 42% of total number of posts in the Government services including appointments of Law Officers in the Courts for Telangana-ites. The grouse so registered is reflected by the writ petitioner in the writ petition itself, relevant paragraph whereof is extracted hereunder: "
4) It is submitted that on 13th September 2010 Telangana Advocates started an agitation with regard to 42% of posts existing in judiciary to be given to regional Telangana Advocates...........They continued their fast un-to death ........................ the Telangana Advocates called for boycott of the Court and also the Court proceedings. So most of the Hon'ble Judges left their benches and stop the Court proceedings in respective Courts. But the Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.