SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 1060

GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
Yenugonda Bal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Manemma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sri L. Prabhakar Reddy, Advocate.
Sri A. Bhuvan Sunder Reddy, Advocate.

Judgment :

The plaintiff in O.S.No.81 of 2007 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, (Fast Track Court), Mahabubnagar, whose application being I.A.No.1542 of 2008 filed under Order 26 Rule 9 C.P.C. for appointment of an Advocate-Commissioner to take measurements of the lands in question with reference to the revenue records and for fixing of boundary stones to the land of the plaintiff with the assistance of Mandal Surveyor for identification of property under dispute was dismissed, by the order, dated 23.11.2009, approached this Court and filed this Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Admittedly, the petitioner herein instituted the said suit alleging that there is a dispute with regard to the boundaries and the same was numbered as O.S.No.81 of 2007 and in the said suit, the petitioner also filed I.A.No.1542 of 2008 seeking appointment of an Advocate-Commissioner.

It is mainly contended by learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff that there was a partition between the plaintiff i.e., the petitioner herein and the vendor of respondents 2 to 4 herein-defendants and if the Advocate-Commissioner is appointed and boundaries are fixed up, everything







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top