SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 221

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
P. Laxmikanth Rao – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D. Prakash Reddy, Advocate.
T. Srinivas, Advocate.

Judgment :

The petitioner is a dealer in products of the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, the 2nd respondent. An outlet was established by it at Dichpally of Nizamabad District on National Highway No.7. Dispensing unit is said to have been established about 50 years ago. An inspection was conducted on 24.11.2009 at 7 p.m. Based upon the observations of the inspection, a show cause notice dated 08.12.2009 was issued alleging that the HSD dispensing unit was delivering 140 ml. litre short, for every five litres. It is also mentioned that on further examination, the lever of the metering unit was found to have been tampered, by replacing a gear with 39 teeth, in the place of the one with 38 teeth.

The petitioner submitted an explanation stating that the seal of the Vending unit was in tact, and that even according to the show cause notice, the respondents have opened the seal, after obtaining the permission of the authorities of the Legal Metrology Department and the Manufacturers. He contends that once the seal is found to be in tact, the dealer cannot be held responsible for any error, or defect as to measurement. He pointed out that the dealer has no control over the dispens






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top