SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 1260

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Kalivarapu Lakshmi Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Burada Appalanaidu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D. Ramalinga Swamy, Advocate.
V.L.N.G.K. Murthy, Advocate.

Judgment :

COMMON ORDER:

Since the subject matter and the parties to both the civil revision petitions are common, they are heard and being disposed of together.

The petitioner in both the civil revision petitions is the judgment debtor in O.S.No.7 of 1988 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Rajam. The suit was filed for specific performance of an agreement of sale. The respondent has subsequently got the plaint amended by including the prayer for recovery of possession as well. However, the trial Court passed decree in favour of the respondent for specific performance of agreement of sale, without reference to the prayer for recovery of possession.

The respondent has filed E.P.No.29 of 2008. The petitioner has filed E.A.No.145 of 2008 under Section 47 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to dismiss the execution petition. The said application was dismissed by the Court below by order, dated 26.03.2010. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner initially has filed civil miscellaneous appeal, which on objections taken by the respondent, was converted into civil revision petition. In the meantime, the Court below has allowed the execution petition and executed















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top