SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 111

NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
G. Narasaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. Raghuveer Reddy, Advocate.
G.P. for Revenue.

Judgment :-

Nisar Ahmad Kakru, J.

1 The controversy owes its origin to a communication of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangaon bearing Rc.No. 1/123/2005, dated 26-05-2007 which may be noticed;

“I am to inform that the land in Sy.No.538 measuring Ac.13.10 Gts situated at Palakurthy Village and Mandal is the Sethsindi Inam land and there is a Title deed dispute between the Inamdars and the Purchasers and appeal case is pending in the Court of the R.D.Os Jangaon and also in SC & ST Commission.

Since it is Inam land, the transactions should not be entertained until the Ownership Right Certificate issued by the competent authority i.e., R.D.O. under the provisions of AP (TA) Inam Abolition Act, 1955.

I therefore request you to not to entertain any registration over the above said Sy.No. till the matter is disposed off and further instructions issued by the Commission.”

2. The above said communication unveils a restraint, placed by the Revenue Divisional Officer Jangaon on the Sub Registrar, preventing him from entertaining the “Sale deed” for registration, executed by the writ petitioner (appellant herein), in respect of Survey No. 538, situate at Palakurthy Village and Mandal, Wa












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top