SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 317

R.KANTHA RAO
Rukmini Bai Alias Laxmi Bai – Appellant
Versus
K. Mohanlal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Suresh Shiv Sagar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Syed Shareef Ahmed, Advocate.

Judgment :

This second appeal is filed against the decree and judgment dated 31.07.2006 passed by the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in A.S.No.528 of 2005 whereby and whereunder the learned III Additional Chief Judge reversed the decree and judgment dated 02.08.2005 passed by the III Additional Rent Controller-cum-XV Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in O.S.No.1613 of 2000.

I have heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.

For the sake of convenience, I would like to refer the parties herein as ‘the plaintiffs and the defendant.’

One Mr. Shiv Raj, the deceased-first plaintiff filed O.S.No.1613 of 2000 against the defendant seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining him and his men from interfering with the suit property which is a vacant site of an extent of 1500 sq. yards or 1254 sq. mtrs, in municipal Ward No.18, Sultan Bagh, Jangummet, Faluknama,Hyderabad. Pending the suit, he died and the remaining plaintiffs have been brought on record as his legal representatives. According to the plaintiffs, they became entitled to the schedule mentioned site by virtue of the registered sale deed dated 14.06.1966 marked as Ex.A.1 exec














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top