SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 304

B.CHANDRA KUMAR
Shaik Zareena Kasam – Appellant
Versus
Patan Sadab Khan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, Advocate.
For the Respondents: None appeared.

Judgment :

1. This revision is directed against the order dated 11.06.2007 passed in I.A.No.293 of 2007 in O.S.No.209 of 2004 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoty, Kadapa District.

2. The petitioner herein is defendant No.3 and the first respondent herein is the plaintiff in the Original Suit. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as they were arrayed in the Original Suit.

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

The plaintiff – Patan Sadab Khan filed a suit being O.S.No.209 of 2004 before the Court below seeking permanent injunction against the defendants therein, not to interfere with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property, which has been described as rice mill which is running in the name and style of ‘Gora Industrial Complex’ at G.K.Rachapalli of Madithadu Revenue Village of T.Sundupalli Mandal in Survey No.984/A in an extent of Acs.0.20 cents bounded on the east by vacant site and juice factories, west by Rastha, North by Rastha and South by Rayachoty – Pincha Road.

4. The plaintiff claimed to be the owner of the suit schedule property and that he had constructed the rice mill and obtained permission to run










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top