GHULAM MOHAMMED, G.CHANDRAIAH
Government of AP, rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue (JA) Department, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
P. Gopala Reddy – Respondent
Ghulam Mohammed
1. The subject matter of dispute in these three writ appeals and writ petition relates to the land situate in an extent of Ac.23-83 cents in Sy.No.46 of Akkarampalle Village, Chandragiri Taluk, locally called as ‘PoolavaniguntaCheruvu’, for short, ‘the subject land’.
2. WA No.1802 of 2005 is filed by the Government of AP represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue (JA) Department, Hyderabad, and two other officers questioning the order dated 8-8-2005 passed in WP No.22656 of 2002. WA No.1817 of 2005 is filed by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirupati (Urban) Mandal, Tirupati, questioning the order dated 8-8-2005 passed in WP No.22868 of 2002.
3. WA No.731 of 2006 is filed by the 3rd party appellant, who is not a party in the writ petition, with the leave of the Court, questioning the order dated 8-8-2005 passed in WP No.22868 of 2002. The appellant in this writ appeal claims that the subject land is an inam land and in the year 1883 there was an enquiry by the Inam Commissioner and after enquiry a title deed, being deed no.2946 has been granted in the names of the then inamdars Aparokham Nayayana Char and two others and the subject land has been in contin
Asha Devi v. Dukhi Sao: AIR 1974 SC 2048. (Para 17)
Baddula Lakshmaiah v. Anjaneya Swami Temple: (1996) 3 SCC 52. (Para 18)
State of Tamil Nadu v. Ramalinga Samigal Madam: AIR 1986 SC 794. (Para 27)
Indian Bank v. Satyam Fibres (India) Pvt. Ltd.: AIR 1996 SC 2592. (Para 30)
Ramchandra G. Shinde v. State of Maharashtra: (1993) 4 SCC 216. (Para 30)
SP Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jagannath: (1994) 1 SCC 1. (Para 30)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.