B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, P.DURGA PRASAD
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. rep. by its Divisional Manager, Dindigal, Tamil Nadu State – Appellant
Versus
Vasireddy Sujatharani – Respondent
B. Seshasayana Reddy
1. This MACMA and the Cross-Objections arose out of the order dated 06.01.2005 passed in MVOP No.1270 of 2000 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-III Additional District Judge, Guntur, (for short, ‘the Tribunal’), whereby and whereunder the Tribunal allowed the petition filed under Sections 163-A and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, (for short, ‘the Act’) and Rule 455 of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, in part and granted compensation of Rs.13,59,300/- with interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of petition to the date of payment.
2.
a) Vasireddy Sujatharani is the claimant in MVOP No.1270 of 2000. Vasireddy Chandraiah @ Chandraiah Naidu is her father. Her father and mother were proceeding in a Maruti Car bearing registration No.AP 9B 1566 from Kavali to Guntur. Her father was driving the Maruti Car. On nearing Chagallu village, a lorry bearing No. TDI 7677 came in high speed from opposite direction, driven in a rash and negligent manner and dashed the Maruti car. As a result, Maruti car got badly damaged, her father and mother received fatal injuries. Her father met with instantaneous death and whereas,
Superintending Engineer v. B.Subba Reddy: (1999) 4 SCC 423. (Para 9)
Ningamma v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.: 2009 (5) SCJ 377. (Para 9)
R.K.Malik v. Kiran Pal: 2009 ACJ 1924. (Para 9)
Syed Basheer Ahamed v. Mohd. Jameel: 2009 (1) SCJ 852. (Para 9)
S.Kaushnuma Begum v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.: AIR 2001 SC 485. (Para 9)
U.P. SRTC v. Trilok Chandra: (1996) 4 SCC 362. (Para 26)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.