SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 370

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
M. Prabhudas – Appellant
Versus
Usirikayala Venkata Ramana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, Advocate.
For the Respondents:M. Sri Rama Murthy, Advocate.

Judgment

CRP No.707 of 2011:

Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C., aggrieved by the Order dated 31/01/2011 in E.P.No.859/2010 in OS.No.5/2007 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Nandyal. CRP.No.749 of 2011:

Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C., aggrieved by the Order dated 31/01/2011 in E.P.No.860/2010 in OS No.6/2007 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Nandyal.)

These two revisions are connected with each other. Hence, they are being disposed of through a common order.

The petitioners borrowed amounts from the 1st respondent. Since the petitioners did not repay the same, the 1st respondent filed O.S.Nos.5 and 6 of 2007 in the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal, for recovery of the same. The suits were decreed. The 1st respondent filed E.P.Nos.859 and 860 of 2010 for execution of the decree by causing attachment of arrears of salary of the petitioners. The petitioners opposed the execution petitions by stating that on earlier occasions, the 1st respondent filed E.P.Nos.280 and 281 of 2007, respectively, and a sum of Rs.40,296/-, each, by attaching the salary for a period of 24 months and by operation of Section 6









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top