SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 603

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Voruganti Narayana Rao – Appellant
Versus
Bodla Rammurthy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:V. Raghu, Advocate.
For the Respondent:G. Simhadri, For Sri K. Venkat Reddy, Advocates.

Judgment :

1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against order, dated 01.06.2011, in I.A.No.177 of 2011 in O.S.No.52 of 2001 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet.

2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in the above mentioned suit filed for recovery of suit amount from the respondents on the basis of the promissory note. On 11.02.2011, the petitioner, who was examined as P.W-1, was cross-examined by the learned counsel for the respondents-defendants. After closure of the evidence on the plaintiff’s side, defendant No.3 filed his affidavit in lieu of chief-examination on 22.03.2011. On 08.04.2011, the respondents filed I.A.No.177 of 2011 for receiving seven pronotes into evidence. This application was resisted by the petitioner by filing a counter-affidavit. It is averred by the petitioner in the said counter-affidavit that the respondents have created and brought into existence the pronotes and that, they failed to show any valid and sufficient reasons for not filing them earlier. The Court below, however, while accepting the plea of the petitioner that the respondents failed to file the pronotes at the earlier stage of the case, allowed the application by holding t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top