All these matters are connected and are substantially between the same parties. Since they have been heard together, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. The facts, which are material, in S.A.No.704 of 2002 are set out hereunder, as the decision in the second appeal would have a bearing on both the revision petitions.

SA.No.704 of 2002:

2. Brief resume of facts is as follows:

(a) Appellant is the plaintiff in the suit O.S.No.5027 of 1993 before the learned VIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The respondents 1 and 2 herein are defendants 1 and 2 in the suit, who are co-owners of the suit property. The respondents 3 to 5 herein, who were arrayed as defendants 3 to 5 in the suit, are the subsequent purchasers. For the sake of convenience, the appellant/plaintiff is referred to as tenant and the first defendant is referred to as the landlord and defendants 3 to 5 as purchasers.

(b) The premises bearing No.20-4-1189 was owned by the first defendant. To the South of this property there was an open land belonging to defendants 1 and 2, which was leased out to the plaintiff/tenant under Ex.A2 dated 01.01.1972. The tenant was allowed to take up con