NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
Jasti Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
The South Central Railway Rep. by its Divisional Manager – Respondent
1. The petitioners, 26 in number in essence seek a Writ of Mandamus for declaring the action of the respondents in trying to evict the petitioners from agricultural lands situate in various survey numbers of Guntupalli and Gudurupadu Villages of Ibrahimpatnam Mandal of Krishna District inspite of the Judgment rendered in O.A.Nos.1-15 of 2003 rendered by the District Court, Krishna at Machilipatnam, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Thefirst respondent is the South Central Railway while the second respondent is its Estate Officer at Vijayawada.
3. It is stated that in the year 1975, 600 acres of land has been acquired compulsorily for the purpose of enabling the Indian Railways to establish a wagon repair workshop at Guntupalli, nearby to Vijayawada City in Krishna District. Lands belonging to the petitioners have also formed part of the overall extent of lands that stood acquired by the railways. The land acquisition proceedings have reached finality in all respects. Compensation as per the market value has been paid to each of the persons to whom the land belongs to was acquired. However, the Indian Railways have put to immediate use only 400 acres of land and established its
Ashoka Marketing Limited v. Punjab National Bank: AIR 1991 SC 855. (Para 9)
Hari Singh and others v. The Military Estate Officer and another: AIR 1972 SC 2205.
Rame Gowda v. M.Varadappa Naidu: AIR 2004 SC 4609 = 2004 (2) AL T 24.1 (ON SC).
D.H. Maniar and others v. Waman Laxman Kudav: AIR 1976 SC 2340. (Para 20)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.