SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 852

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Aquadev India Ltd. , Rep. by its Director – Appellant
Versus
Kode Basava Venkateswara Rao – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:V. Hari Haran, Advocate.
For the Respondents: None appeared.

Judgment :

The plaintiffs, in an unnumbered suit presented in the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole, filed this revision petition feeling aggrieved by the order, dated, 04-07-2011, passed by the trial Court.

2. The 1st respondent filed O.S No.10 of 1998 against the petitioner for recovery of a sum of Rs.6,61,027/- as arrears of salary. An ex parte decree was passed in the suit on 17-04-2003. Based on that decree, the 1st respondent filed E.P. No.33 of 2003 and got attached an extent of Acs.6.20 cents of land owned by the petitioner. The property was brought to sale and the 2nd respondent emerged as highest bidder.

3. The petitioner contends that it was under liquidation as a result of an order of this Court in C.P. No.84 of 1996, and that O.S. No.10 of 1998 filed in the Court of the Principal District Judge, Ongole, was not maintainable, when liquidation proceedings were in progress. Pleading that the 1st respondent played fraud on it and the trial Court, petitioner filed the present suit with a prayer to declare that the decree and judgment in O.S.No.10 of 1998, dated 17-04-2003, and consequential Execution Proceedings are null and void and for permanent injunction









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top