SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 969

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Kunta Rajitha – Appellant
Versus
Jayapal Reddy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:Nandigam Krishna Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Naresh Byrapaneni, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The appellants filed O.P.No.956 of 2000 before the Chairman, Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge), Warangal (for short ‘the Tribunal’) claiming a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation on account of the death of Kunta Venkanna, husband of appellant No.1, son of appellant Nos.2 and 3 and brother of appellant Nos.4, 5 and 6. It was stated that Venkanna was working as an Advocate Clerk at Warangal and that on 30.07.2000, himself and another Clerk, by name Bommera Raju (P.W.1) were coming from Wardhannapet to Warangal and that when they reached Panthini Village, a Jeep bearing No.AP12 T 1700, owned by respondent No.1 and insured with respondent No.2, dashed against the Scooter, resulting in death of Venkanna and injuries to Bommera Raju. It was pleaded that the accident occurred on account of rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the Jeep. The deceased was said to be aged 25 years and that his income was Rs.4,000/- per month.

2. Respondent No.1 remained ex parte. The O.P. was contested by respondent No.2. A counter was filed putting the appellants herein to strict proof of the facts pleaded by them. It was also pleaded that there is a poss




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top