GHULAM MOHAMMED, NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
APSRTC rep by its Managing Director Musheerabad, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
K. Moses – Respondent
Ghulam Mohammed, ACJ.
This appeal is directed against the order and judgment rendered by our learned brother Justice Sanjay Kumar who allowed the writ petition instituted by the respondent herein.
2. The respondent-petitioner was employed as a driver with the first respondent-A.P.S.R.T.C. He met with an accident on 03.01.2006 while returning home from duty, rendering him unfit to continue in service as a driver because of the disability sustained in that accident. When he got served legal notice on 13.08.2007, the A.P.S.R.T.C responded by calling upon him to receive his terminal benefits. On 31.08.2007, the writ petitioner, has instead reiterated his claim for alternative employment. At that stage, he instituted W.P.No.2058 of 2007. By an interlocutory order passed therein on 12.10.2007, a learned single Judge directed the A.P.S.R.T.C to consider his case for alternative employment in accordance with the provision contained under Section 47 of The Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, henceforth referred to as Disabilities Protection Act. In response to that order, the A.P.S.R.T.C conveyed the decision th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.