L.NARASIMHA REDDY
K. V. V. Balasubramanyam – Appellant
Versus
B. Markandeyulu – Respondent
Common questions of law and fact arise in these eight revisions. Hence they are heard and disposed of through a common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to, as arrayed in the suits.
2. O.S.Nos.928, 929, 930 and 931 of 2007 are filed by different plaintiffs, against common defendants, in the Court of I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar. M/s Totem Projects Private Limited, figured as 3rd plaintiff in all the suits. The relief of specific performance of agreements of sale in respect of various items of immovable property and other consequential reliefs are prayed for. The plaints were initially presented on the day, on which the Courts reopened; after summer vacation viz., 02-06-2007. They were returned with certain objections. By the time the plaints were represented, it appears that transactions in respect of the suit schedule properties have taken place. Therefore subsequent purchasers were included in the array of parties, while re-presenting the plaints. Mention was also made to the subsequent developments in detail. The suits were ultimately numbered, some time in September, 2007.
3.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.