SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 855

C.V.RAMULU
Kodali Raju – Appellant
Versus
APSRTC, rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Hyderabad – Respondent


ORDER:

1. A short question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is as to whether the petitioners are entitled for regularization of their services in the Respondent-APSRTC or not.

2. It appears, petitioners four in number, were appointed as Cleaners/Sweepers in the Respondent-Corporation and were initially attached to Gannavaram Depot in May 1989 and worked upto 30.6.1992. However, with effect from 1.7.1992, their services were terminated. Aggrieved by the same, they have filed I.D.No.280 of 1992 and batch before the Labour Court, Guntur under Section 2-A(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking a direction to the Respondent Corporation to reinstate them into service with continuity of service, back wages and attendant benefits. The Labour Court, Guntur, by a common award dated 16.7.1997 directed the Respondent-Management to reinstate the petitioners into service with continuity of service, back wages and all attendant benefits. Aggrieved thereby, respondent-management filed Writ Petition Nos.32954 of 1997 and batch before this Court, however, this Court by order dated 1.4.2003 dismissed the said writ petitions. Questioning the same, management carried the matt



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top