SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 590

SANJAY KUMAR
Syed Munaf – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa, Collector Complex Premises, Kadapa – Respondent


ORDER:


1. The petitioners complain of inaction on the part of the Sub-Registrar, T.Sundupalli, Kadapa District, respondent 3, in registering the documents presented by them and in insisting upon production of a ‘No Objection Certificate’ from the revenue authorities. They seek a consequential direction to register and release the said documents without insisting on such certification by the revenue authorities.

2. Petitioner 1 claims title and possession over an extent of Ac.0.60 cents in Survey No.364/1D of Pemmadapalle Village, Rayachoty Sub-Division, Kadapa District. He traces title to this property to a registered transaction dating back to the year 1950. Petitioners 2 to 12 claim to be the legal heirs of late Dada Sab who purchased an extent of Ac.0.85 cents in Survey No.364/1C of Pemmadapalle Village, Rayachoty Sub-Division, Kadapa District, under a registered sale deed bearing Document No.2387/1977 dated 21.07.1977. They also are in a position to trace the lineage of the title back to a registered transaction of the year 1933. The grievance of the petitioners is that when they approached the registration authorities seeking to alienate their lands, they were informed that the
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top