The short question that falls for consideration in these batch of revisions is whether against the dismissal of I.A.SRs filed under Order IX Rule 13 CPC by the District Consumer Forum-II, a revision under Article 227 of the Constitution can be entertained or not?

Petitioner in all the revisions is the second opposite party before the District Consumer Forum-II, Vijayawada in C.C.Nos.252 to 255 of 2008, 18, 19, 79, 80, 86 and 93 of 2009 filed by the various respondents/complainants. In the complaint lodged by the 1st respondent/complainant before the District Consumer Forum-II, Vijayawada, an ex parte order was passed on 31.03.2007 for non-appearance of the petitioner and also opposite party No.1 and the said C.Cs. were posted on 03.04.2009 for filing the affidavit of the complainant. On complainant filing the affidavit on the said date, the Forum posted the C.Cs., for orders on 06.04.2009 and accordingly, allowed the C.Cs. on 06.04.2009. Thereby, the petitioner filed I.A.(SR).Nos.1493, 1497, 1461 and 1459, 1401, 1400, 1441, 1481, 1440, 1464 of 2009 in the said C.Cs. respectively, under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to set aside the ex parte order, dated 06.04.2009. The said I.A.(