K.G.SHANKAR
Kothalanka Durga Vara Prasada Rao – Appellant
Versus
Datla Chanraiah – Respondent
1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.552 of 1982 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Bhimavaram laid this appeal seeking for the partition of plaint A & B schedule property, for declaration and for title. The suit was laid under the provisions of Order 33 CPC (informa pauparis) by the sole plaintiff as an indigent person. The suit was numbered by the learned Sub-Judge, Bhimavaram. Through the judgment, the trial Court declared that the plaintiff, the 6th defendant and the 14th defendant were entitled to half share in the plaint A schedule property on the death of their mother Kothalanka Kameswaramma and that they should be entitled to the remaining half after the demise of the 7th defendant. A preliminary decree accordingly was passed for partition of the plaint A schedule property by meats and bounds and for future mesne profits. So far as the B schedule is concerned, the entire suit was dismissed. The trial Court further directed that the plaintiff shall pay the court fee so far as B schedule property is concerned, while the plaintiff, the 6th and the 14th defendants in one set and the other defendants in other set should bear the court fee in respect of plaint A schedule property in e
Tilak Dhari Lal v Khedan Lal (AIR 1921 PC 112)
Veeraswami v D.V. Subba Rao (AIR 1957 AP 288)
Jumma Masjid v Kodimaniandra Deviah (AIR 1962 SC 847)
Gomathy Ammal v Rukmini Amma (AIR 1967 Ker 58)
Renu Devi v Mahendra Singh (AIR 2003 (SC) 1608)
Murarka Properties Private Limited v Beharilal Murarka (AIR 1978 SC 300)
United of India v E.I.D. Parry (India) Ltd. ((2000) 2 SCC 223)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.