SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 1190

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Ponjurangam – Appellant
Versus
Darshanala Swamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:D. Srinivasa Prasad, Advocate.
For the Respondents:M.V. Suresh, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. While the appellants are the legal representatives of the sole defendant in O.S.No.157 of 1990 on the file of the V Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the respondents are the legal representatives of the sole plaintiff in that suit. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as ‘plaintiff’ and ‘defendant’.

2. The suit was filed for the relief of declaration of title, mandatory injunction for removal of structures and recovery of possession of suit schedule property of about 280 square yards, in premises bearing No.3-7-141 of Kakaguda, Hyderabad. The plaintiff pleaded that the property admeasuring 350 square yards, in all, was acquired by himself and one Darshanala Ramaswmay jointly, and on the death of Ramaswamy, it has accrued to him by survivorship. It was stated that part of the property was given on lease to the defendant, initially on a rent of Rs.50/-, per month, and thereafter, Rs.75/- per month. It was stated that, when the defendant is making the construction on his own accord, notice of eviction was issued, requiring him to pay the arrears. Alleging that the defendant did not accede to the request, the plaintiff filed the su























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top