SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(AP) 1113

R.KANTHA RAO
Haneef Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Shabbir – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K Gopal, Counsel for the Petitioner;
v:Siva Prasad, Counsel for the Respondent.

ORDER :-

1 have heard Sri K. Gopal, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri V. Siva Prasad, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent and also the respondent in person.

2. The brief facts relating to contempt case may be stated as follows:

The petitioner/landlord filed RC No.202 of 2003 on the file of the II Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad seeking eviction of the respondent/tenant from the schedule premises in the ground floor bearing No.227-203/B, Devandevdi, Hyderabad on the ground of committing willful default in payment of rent and also that the premises was required bona fide, for personal occupation of the petitioner/landlord. The rent control case was allowed and the respondent/ tenant was evicted by the learned Rent Controller by his order dated 19.11.2007.

3. Aggrieved by the same, the respondent/tenant preferred an appeal i.e. RA No.7 of 2008 which was heard and disposed of by the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad. The said R.A. was dismissed by the judgment dated 12.10.2009 confirming the order passed by the Rent Controller.

4. Thereafter, the respondent/tenant filed CRP No.60 II of 2009 before this Court. In the said revision petit








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top