SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 955

P.V.SANJAY KUMAR
Yerra Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
Nathi Mallesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M. Jagannatha Sarma, Counsel for the Petitioner;
Jayanti SC Sekhar, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3.

ORDER :-

The temporary injunction granted by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Gajwel, in IA No.263 of 2009 in as No.76 of 2009 was set aside in appeal in CMA No.32 of 2009 by the learned VI Additional District Judge at Siddipet, Medak District. Hence, this civil revision petition by the plaintiff in the suit.

2. The appellate order was suspended on 18.7.2011 pending this revision.

3. Parties shall be referred to as arrayed before the trial. Court.

4. The suit, as No.76 of 2009, was filed for a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with and disturbing the plaintiff s possession over the suit schedule plot admeasuring 292Y2 square yards in Sy.No.222/AN4 of Kallakal Village, Toopran MandaI, Medak District. The plaintiff also sought an interim injunction pending the suit to protect his possession over the suit plot. It was his case that one Nathi Bhoomaiah was the original pattadar and possessor of an extent of Ac.0-25 guntas of dry land in Sy.No.222 of Kallakal Village. Bhoomaiah died leaving his widow, Nathi Mallamma, and two sons, Nathi Pentaiah and Nathi Chandraiah. Mallamma 's name was recorded as the pattadar of the land in the revenue records, but the land















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top