SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 1098

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Dastagir Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Khairunnisa Rahana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:T.S. Anand, Advocate. For the Respondents: V.L.N.G.K. Murthy,
Advocate.

Judgment :

COMMON JUDGMENT:

These two Second Appeals arise out of a common judgment rendered by the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagar in O.S.Nos.1466 of 1993 and 1473 of 1 993. The plaintiff and 1st defendant in O.S.No.1466 of 1993 figured as the sole defendant and plaintiff, respectively, in O.S.No.1473 of 1993.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in O.S.No.1466 of 1993.

3. That suit was filed initially for the relief of declaration of title and injunction in respect of Acs.1-11 guntas of land in Survey No.749 of Bommakal Village of Karimngar Mandal and District. The plaintiff pleaded that Acs.4.32 guntas of land in Survey No.749 was owned by one Abdul Razak, who had two sons, by name, Abdul Sattar and Ahmedulla Quadri and a daughter, by name, Huzurunnisa Begum, the 8th defendant. Defendant No.4, by name, Theetla Sailu, is said to have purchased Ac.1.20 guntas of land from Abdul Sattar in the year 1970 under an unregistered sale deed, for a consideration of Rs.850/- and that his name was recorded as cultivator and possessor. On the same day, the brother of the 4th defendant i.e. the 5th defendant, is said to have purchased an























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top